|
In this letter, we complained to the Exchange about the valuation and their actions. They did not forward the complaint to the LSE Complaints Commissioner - as the FSA said they should have. |
![]() |
|
This is the crucial letter where the London Stock Exchange lied for the third time. On page 3 paragraph (iii) they state that the valuation of the offer was free from influence by the Exchange or the market makers. They then repeated this at the top of page 4. |
|
|
|
Yet the LSE Complaints Commissioner’s report letter of 23 June 2005 page 5 para 5 says that the valuer was given instructions by the Exchange. To discount the effect of the open short positions on the price. This means that the Exchange lied - the Exchange committed an offence under Section 397 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Not once but twice in the same letter. As they acted dishonestly in concealing the valuation instructions from the victims of the Room Service market abuse and did not protect their interests, according to the Recognition Requirements, they acted in bad faith and under section 291 FSMA, they are liable for their acts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Created and designed by the RSV Shareholders’ Action Group © 2003 - 2007 |
|
The information within this website is the property of the Room Service Shareholders’ Action Group. All statements are the opinions of the members and no malice is intended. |
|
|
|